{"id":46,"date":"2021-02-20T14:22:41","date_gmt":"2021-02-20T16:22:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inkerikoskinen.net\/?page_id=46"},"modified":"2026-03-19T06:32:56","modified_gmt":"2026-03-19T08:32:56","slug":"publications","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/inkerikoskinen.net\/?page_id=46","title":{"rendered":"Publications"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.9.0″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.9.0″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.9.0″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.9.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″]<\/p>\n

BOOKS<\/h4>\n

Ludwig, David, Inkeri Koskinen, Zinhle Mncube,Luana Poliseli, and Luis Reyes-Galindo (eds.). 2021. <\/span>Global Epistemologies and Philosophies of Science<\/span><\/i>. Routledge.<\/span><\/p>\n

Haaparanta, Leila, Inkeri Koskinen, and Teemu Toppinen (eds.). 2021. Proceedings of the Annual Colloquium of the Philosophical Society of Finland 2020 (FiPhi 2020)<\/i>. Acta Philosophica Fennica<\/i> XCVII. Helsinki: the Philosophical Society of Finland.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2015. Villi Suomen historia: V\u00e4limeren V\u00e4in\u00e4m\u00f6isest\u00e4 \u00c4ij\u00e4kupittaan pyramideihin<\/em>. [The Wild History of Finland: From V\u00e4in\u00e4m\u00f6inen at the Mediterranean to the pyramids of \u00c4ij\u00e4kupittaa. A popular book on pseudohumanities and demarcation.] Helsinki: Tammi.<\/span><\/p>\n

ARTICLES<\/h4>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2026. Values and Objectivity<\/a>. In\u00a0Kevin Elliott and Ted Richards (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Values and Science<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri, and Anna Alexandrova. 2025.\u00a0Conceptual Analysis Plus. In\u00a0Sophie J Veigl, Adrian Currie (eds.), Methods in the Philosophy of Science: A User’s Guide<\/em>. MIT Press, 105\u2013124.<\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2025. Is the argument from inductive risk merely research ethics?<\/a> In\u00a0 In A. Laitinen, M. Kein\u00e4nen, J. Reinikainen & A. Honkasalo (eds.). Language, Truth, and Reality:<\/em>\u00a0Philosophical essays in honour of Panu Raatikainen<\/em>. Tampere University Press,\u00a080\u201387.<\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2024.\u00a0We Have No Satisfactory Social Epistemology of AI-Based Science<\/a>. Social Epistemology,\u00a0<\/em>38 (4), 458-475.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2024.\u00a0Onko posthumanistinen valistushumanismin kritiikki humanismia? In\u00a0Hemmo Laiho & Olli Koistinen (eds.),\u00a0Valistuksen haaste: Kirjoituksia j\u00e4rjen ja tiedon merkityksest\u00e4<\/em>. Gaudeamus, 93\u2013112.<\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2023. Participation and Objectivity<\/a>. Philosophy of Science\u00a0<\/em><\/span>90(2), 413-432.<\/span><\/p>\n

Rolin, Kristina, Inkeri Koskinen, Jaakko Kuorikoski, and Samuli Reijula. 2023. Social and cognitive diversity in science: introduction<\/a>. Synthese 202, 36.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2023.\u00a0Societal impact in research collaborations beyond the boundaries of science<\/a>.\u00a0Perspectives on Science\u00a0<\/em>31:6, 744\u2013770.<\/span><\/p>\n

Eigi-Watkin,\u00a0Jaana & Koskinen, Inkeri. 2023.\u00a0Reasoning by analogy and the transdisciplinarian’s circle: on the problem of knowledge transfer across cases in transdisciplinary research<\/a>. Sustainability Science 18, <\/em>1343\u20131353.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2022.\u00a0How institutional solutions meant to increase diversity in science fail<\/a>. Synthese\u00a0<\/em><\/span>200, 483.<\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2022.\u00a0Reactivity as a tool in emancipatory activist research<\/a>.\u00a0European Journal for Philosophy of Science\u00a0<\/em>12, 65.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri & Rolin, Kristina. 2022.\u00a0Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate roles for values in transdisciplinary research<\/a>.\u00a0Studies in History and Philosophy of Science<\/em> 91,\u00a0191-198.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2022.\u00a0Engaging or not engaging with transdisciplinary research: on methodological choices in philosophical case studies<\/a>. In G. Heinzmann and B. L\u00f6we (eds.)\u00a0Comptes Rendus de l’Acad\u00e9mie de Philosophie des Sciences 1: Science’s Voice of Reflection<\/em>.\u00a0Acad\u00e9mie Internationale de Philosophie des Sciences (AIPS), 59\u201374.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2021. Objectivity in contexts: withholding epistemic judgement as a strategy for mitigating collective bias<\/a>. <\/span>Synthese\u00a0<\/span><\/i>199, 211\u2013225.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri and Ludwig, David. 2021. Philosophy or Philosophies? Epistemology or Epistemologies?<\/a> In Ludwig, D., Koskinen, I., Mncube, Z., Poliseli, L. and Reyes-Galindo, L. (eds.),\u00a0<\/span>Global Epistemologies and Philosophies of Science<\/span><\/i>. Routledge, 15\u201325.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri and Rolin, Kristina. 2021. Structural epistemic (in) justice in global contexts. In Ludwig, D., Koskinen, I., Mncube, Z., Poliseli, L. and Reyes-Galindo, L. (eds.),\u00a0<\/span>Global Epistemologies and Philosophies of Science<\/span><\/i>. Routledge, 115\u2013125.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2020. Defending a risk account of scientific objectivity<\/a>. <\/span>The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science <\/span><\/i>71:4, 1187\u20131207.<\/span><\/p>\n

Nagatsu, M., Davis, T., DesRoches, C. T., Koskinen, I., MacLeod, M., Stojanovic, M., and Thor\u00e9n, H. 2020. Philosophy of Science for Sustainability Science<\/a>. <\/span>Sustainability\u00a0Science\u00a0<\/span><\/i>15, 1807\u20131817.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri and Rolin, Kristina. 2019. Scientific\/intellectual movements remedying epistemic injustice: The case of Indigenous studies. <\/span>Philosophy of Science<\/span><\/i> 86:5, 1052\u20131063.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2019. Relativism in the Philosophy of Anthropology. In Kusch, M. (ed.), <\/span>The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism<\/span><\/i>. London and New York: Routledge, 425\u2013434.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2019. Antihumanismi, posthumanismi ja humanistiset tieteet. [Antihumanism, posthumanism and the humanities.] <\/span>Niin & n\u00e4in<\/span><\/i> 19:1.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2018. Miksi tieteilij\u00f6iden kannattaa tehd\u00e4 yhteisty\u00f6t\u00e4 taiteilijoiden kanssa<\/a> [Why scientists should collaborate with artists.] <\/span>Ajatus<\/span><\/i> 75, 93\u2013119.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2018. Voiko se olla objektiivista? Tieteenulkoinen tieto ja yhteisty\u00f6 soveltavassa kulttuurintutkimuksessa [Can it be objective? Extra-academic knowledge and collaboration in applied cultural research]. In P. H\u00e4meenaho, T. Suopaj\u00e4rvi and J. Ylipulli (eds.), <\/span>Soveltava kulttuurintutkimus<\/span><\/i> [<\/span>Applied cultural research<\/span><\/i>]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, 129\u2013154.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2017. Where is the epistemic community? On democratisation of science and social accounts of objectivity<\/a>. <\/span>Synthese<\/span><\/i> 194:12, 4671\u20134686.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri & M\u00e4ki, Uskali. 2016. Extra-academic transdisciplinarity and scientific pluralism: What might they learn from one another? <\/a><\/span>The European Journal of Philosophy of Science<\/span><\/i> 6:3, 419\u2013444.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Kokkonen, Tomi & Koskinen, Inkeri. 2016. Genres as Real Kinds and Projections: Homeostatic Property Clusters in Folklore and Art<\/a>. In Frog and K. Koski (eds.), Genre \u2013 Text \u2013 Interpretation<\/i>. Studia Fennica Folkloristica<\/i>, Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, 89\u2013109.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2016. Objektiivisuus humanistisissa tieteiss\u00e4<\/a> [Objectivity in the humanities]. <\/span>Niin & n\u00e4in <\/span><\/i>4\/2016, 35\u201342.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2016. Miten humanistinen tutkimus vaikuttaa yhteiskunnassa?<\/a> [What is the societal impact of humanities research?] Tiedepolitiikka<\/i> 4\/2016.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2015. Researchers Building Nations: Under what conditions can overtly political research be objective?<\/a> In U. M\u00e4ki, S. Ruphy, G. Schurz and I. Votsis (eds.), <\/span>Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science: EPSA13 Helsinki<\/span><\/i>. Cham: Springer, 129\u2013140.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2014. At least Two Concepts of Culture<\/a>. <\/span>Folklore<\/span><\/i> 125:3, 267\u2013285.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2014. Critical Subjects: Participatory Research Needs to Make Room for Debate<\/a>. <\/span>Philosophy of the Social Sciences<\/span><\/i>, 44:6, 733\u2013751.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2014. Alkuper\u00e4iskansojen tieto tutkimuksessa: tieteenfilosofinen n\u00e4k\u00f6kulma. [Indigenous knowledge in scientific research.] P. H\u00e4meenaho and E. Koskinen-Koivisto (eds.),<\/span> Moniulotteinen etnografia<\/span><\/i> [<\/span>Multiform ethnography<\/span><\/i>]. Helsinki: Ethnos, 128\u2013152.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2011. Seemingly Similar Beliefs: A Case Study on Relativistic Research Practices. <\/span>Philosophy of the Social Sciences<\/span><\/i> 41:1, 84\u2013110.<\/span><\/p>\n

EDITORIAL WORK AND TRANSLATIONS<\/h4>\n

Raatikainen, Panu,\u00a0Bergman, Mats, and Koskinen, Inkeri (eds.) 2021.\u00a0Ajatus<\/span><\/i> 78. Helsinki: the Philosophical Society of Finland. 334 p.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Laitinen, Arto, Bergman, Mats, and Koskinen, Inkeri (eds). 2020. <\/span>Ajatus<\/span><\/i> 77. Helsinki: the Philosophical Society of Finland. 448 p.<\/span><\/p>\n

Laitinen, Arto, Bergman, Mats, and Koskinen, Inkeri (eds). 2019. <\/span>Ajatus<\/span><\/i> 76. Helsinki: the Philosophical Society of Finland. 389 p.<\/span><\/p>\n

Laitinen, Arto, Bergman, Mats, and Koskinen, Inkeri (eds). 2018. <\/span>Ajatus<\/span><\/i> 75. Helsinki: Philosophical Society of Finland. 537 p.<\/span><\/p>\n

Hacking, Ian. 2009. <\/span>Mit\u00e4 sosiaalinen konstruktionismi on?<\/span><\/i> [<\/span>The Social Construcion of What?<\/span><\/i>] Translated by Inkeri Koskinen, Tampere: Osuuskunta Vastapaino.<\/span><\/p>\n

Virno, Paolo. 2006. <\/span>V\u00e4en kielioppi: ehdotus analyysiksi nykyp\u00e4iv\u00e4n el\u00e4m\u00e4nmuodoista<\/span><\/i> [<\/span>Grammatica della moltitudine: Per una analisi delle forme di vita contemporanee<\/span><\/i>]. Translated by Inkeri Koskinen. Helsinki: Tutkijaliitto.<\/span><\/p>\n

Salminen, Antero. 2005. <\/span>P\u00e4\u00e4jalkainen: kuva ja havainto<\/span><\/i> [collection of essays about art education]. Edited by Inkeri Koskinen. Helsinki: University of Art and Design.<\/span><\/p>\n

Todd, Emmanuel. 2003. <\/span>Imperiumin j\u00e4lkeen<\/span><\/i> [<\/span>Apr\u00e8s l’empire<\/span><\/i>]. Translated by Inkeri Koskinen. Helsinki: Rasalas.<\/span><\/p>\n

PUBLICATIONS FOR GENERAL AUDIENCES, COMMENTARIES AND REPLIES<\/h4>\n

P\u00e4ivi Sepp\u00e4l\u00e4 and Inkeri Koskinen. 2025. Competency assessment tests in the application process for salaried PhD positions do not promote fairness, objectivity, or transparency<\/a>. TINT Blog.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Hirvonen, Ilmari, Kaisa Luoma, P\u00e4ivi Sepp\u00e4l\u00e4, Marko J Forsell, and Inkeri Koskinen. 2025.\u00a0N\u00e4enn\u00e4istiede t\u00f6iss\u00e4. niin&n\u00e4in<\/em> 2\/2025.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2024. We Still Have No Satisfactory Social Epistemology of AI-Based Science: A Response to Peters<\/a>. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective<\/em> 13:5, 9\u201314.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2024.\u00a0Miten tieteenfilosofin kannattaisi tutkia objektiivisuuden k\u00e4sitett\u00e4?<\/a>\u00a0niin&n\u00e4in<\/em> 2\/2024.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2022.\u00a0A useful overview of contemporary debates about scientific objectivity<\/a>. Metascience<\/em>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2021.\u00a0Kannattaako tieteellisest\u00e4 objektiivisuudesta puhua?<\/a> Areiopagi<\/em> 10.8.2021.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2021. Emancipatory Activist Movements Can Build Collective Intellectual Self-Trust\u2014But Not Always in Ways We Would Like<\/a>. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective<\/em> 10:2, 21\u201326.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2019. Elitistisen sivistyshumanismin puolustus [book review]. <\/span>Tiedepolitiikka<\/span><\/i> 2019:1.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Rusanen, Anna-Mari and Koskinen, Inkeri. 2018. Tiede, teko\u00e4ly ja tiedolliset riskit. [Science, AI, and epistemic risks]. Futura 37:4, 47-52.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2018. Ett\u00e4 maailma muuttuisi paremmaksi [So that the world would become a better place] In L\u00e4hde & Vehkoo (eds.) <\/span>Jakautuuko Suomi?<\/span><\/i> [Is Finland becoming divided?] Helsinki: Into.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2017. P\u00e4\u00e4kirjoitus: Punkit foliossa ja luottamus tieteeseen. [Editorial: Ticks in foil and trust in science]. <\/span>Tieteess\u00e4 tapahtuu<\/span><\/i> 35:4, 1\u20132.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2017. Not-So-Well-Designed Scientific Communities<\/a>. <\/span>Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective<\/span><\/i> 6:10, 54\u201358.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2016. Tietysti se on totta \u2013 sit\u00e4h\u00e4n on tutkittu! [Of course it is true \u2013 it has been studied!] <\/span>Suomen Kuvalehti<\/span><\/i> 48\/2016.<\/span><\/p>\n

Jukola, Saana and Koskinen, Inkeri. 2013. Helen Longino tieteiden rajalinjoilla. [Interview with Helen Longino.] <\/span>Niin & n\u00e4in<\/span><\/i> 13:3.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2012. Ymm\u00e4rt\u00e4minen t\u00e4m\u00e4n p\u00e4iv\u00e4n alkuper\u00e4iskansatutkimuksessa. [Understanding in Indigenous studies.] In <\/span>Ymm\u00e4rrys<\/span><\/i>, edited by Valtteri Viljanen, Helena Siipi ja Matti Sintonen. Turku: University of Turku.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2010. Intiaanikreationistit ja tiedollisen relativismin kauhistus. [American indian creationists and the horror of epistemic relativism.] <\/span>Niin & n\u00e4in<\/span><\/i> 17:1.<\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2008. Pit\u00e4isik\u00f6 turvautua kulttuuriperinteisiin? [Should we resort to tradition?] In Vad\u00e9n, Tere (ed.) Linkolan ajamana<\/i>. Helsinki: Like.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2008. ‘Kulttuuri’ – k\u00e4site ty\u00f6kaluna. [“Culture” \u2013 a concept as a tool.] <\/span>Niin & n\u00e4in<\/span><\/i> 14:2.<\/span><\/p>\n

THESIS<\/h4>\n

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2015. <\/span>Changing Research Communities: Essays on Objectivity and Relativism in Contemporary Cultural Research<\/span><\/i>. Helsinki: Philosophical Studies from the University of Helsinki 47. Doctoral dissertation.<\/span><\/p>\n

SELECTED NON-ACADEMIC TRANSLATIONS<\/h4>\n

Malvaldi, Marco. 2015. <\/span>Kolmen kortin temppu<\/span><\/i> [<\/span>Il gioco delle tre carte<\/span><\/i>]. Translated by Inkeri Koskinen. Helsinki: Tammi.<\/span><\/p>\n

Malvaldi, Marco. 2014. <\/span>Viiden korttipeli<\/span><\/i> [<\/span>La briscola in cinque<\/span><\/i>]. Translated by Inkeri Koskinen. Helsinki: Tammi.<\/span><\/p>\n

Stoker, Bram. 2012. <\/span>Draculan vieras ja muita kauhukertomuksia<\/span><\/i> [<\/span>Dracula’s Guest and Other Weird Stories<\/span><\/i>]. Translation and foreword by Inkeri Koskinen. Helsinki: Tammi.<\/span><\/p>\n

Bronte\u0308, Charlotte. 2009. <\/span>Professori<\/span><\/i> [<\/span>The Professor<\/span><\/i>]. Translation and foreword by Inkeri Koskinen. Helsinki: Tammi.<\/span><\/p>\n

Austen, Jane. 2009. <\/span>Uskollinen yst\u00e4v\u00e4nne: kootut kertomukset<\/span><\/i> [<\/span>Your faithful friend<\/span><\/i>; a collection of juvenilia]. Selection, translation and foreword by Inkeri Koskinen. Helsinki: Tammi.<\/span><\/p>\n

Alcott, Louisa M. 2005. <\/span>Naamion takana: kootut kertomukset<\/span><\/i> [<\/span>Behind a mask<\/span><\/i>; a collection of short stories]. Selection, translation and foreword by Inkeri Koskinen. Helsinki: Helmi.<\/span><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.9.0″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.9.0″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.9.0″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.9.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″] BOOKS Ludwig, David, Inkeri Koskinen, Zinhle Mncube,Luana Poliseli, and Luis Reyes-Galindo (eds.). 2021. Global Epistemologies and Philosophies of Science. Routledge. Haaparanta, Leila, Inkeri Koskinen, and Teemu Toppinen (eds.). 2021. Proceedings of the Annual Colloquium of the Philosophical Society of Finland 2020 (FiPhi […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-46","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inkerikoskinen.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/46","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inkerikoskinen.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inkerikoskinen.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inkerikoskinen.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inkerikoskinen.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=46"}],"version-history":[{"count":40,"href":"https:\/\/inkerikoskinen.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/46\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":336,"href":"https:\/\/inkerikoskinen.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/46\/revisions\/336"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inkerikoskinen.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=46"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}